Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 19:01

Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
The Aging Brain: 6 Things You Should Be Doing to Slow Cognitive Decline - CNET
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Kate Middleton Shares a Rare Family Photo After Trooping the Colour - instyle.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
CVS to shutter 5 pharmacies in New York amid closure of 271 stores nationwide - New York Post
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why is the Middle East prone to terrorism?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
European Mars orbiter spies crumbling crater 'soaked in layers of Martian history' (photo) - Space
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.